About the data in front of you
None of it is real, and that is deliberate. This page says exactly what you are looking at, so that nothing here can be mistaken for an ISC record.
The people
Every competitor, official, Head of Delegation and judge in this environment is invented, including their names, dates of birth, licence numbers and contact details. No real person's data has been loaded into this environment and none should be. If that ever changed, this would stop being a demonstration and the data protection questions in document 08 of the submission would apply to it in full, starting with where it is hosted.
The events and the federations
The championships, the national federations and the organising bodies are invented for the evaluation. They are shaped like real ones, because the sporting rules in Appendix 1 only mean something against a plausible delegation, but they correspond to nothing.
The FAI Sporting Licence check
Validation runs against MockFAIProvider, a mock implementation of the provider interface that returns scripted results. It is labelled as a mock on every screen it appears on. Nothing in this build has ever contacted an FAI system, and nothing can: production API access is issued by FAI IT only after Plenary approval, on equal terms to all approved providers. The adapter, the field mapping and the four error messages are real and working; the data behind them is not.
The dates
The workspace runs on a simulated clock that you can set yourself, because half the rules in the requirements are about time: a submission window, a blocked period, a review deadline, a registration window closing. Moving the clock changes real behaviour rather than labels. A submission inside the blocked window is genuinely refused, and the bid is still a draft afterwards.
The money
Fees are ISC configuration, not code, and the figures here are the ones the ISC publishes. The ISC Fees Schedule 2026, dated 30 January 2026, gives the Bid Application Fee as 800 CHF and the Sanction Fee as 110 CHF for 2026, against 105 CHF for 2025. Both are loaded from it. That schedule carries 2025 and 2026 columns only, so they are shown as the 2026 published rate rather than as what a 2028 event will be charged, and which year governs a 2028 event is one of the questions we have put to the working group.
The Performance Bond is published in the same schedule, as a tier table by the number of disciplines rather than an amount per discipline: 5,000, 9,000, 12,000, 14,000 and 15,000 CHF for one, two, three, four, and five or more. No tier is switched on here, and that is a question rather than a gap: which tier applies depends on how disciplines are grouped, and FCEAD 2.2.4.1 and the schedule's own note about Style and Accuracy with Canopy Piloting are worded differently. The payment offsets from the Opening Ceremony date are published nowhere at all. Nothing in this environment is authority to charge or to pay anything.
Your own workspace
When you sign in you get a private copy of all of this. It is yours: nothing you do is visible to another evaluator, nothing another evaluator does reaches you, and you can put it back to the way it started at any time from the workspace page. That reset rebuilds your copy from the protected reference workspace and touches nothing else.